These are questionnaires created
with an intention to improvise the activity conducted in the meeting. The
evaluation forms give immediate response on how fruitful the members thought
about this activity. This feedback is given anonymously, so the members need
not worry about hurting anyone’s feelings because mostly this feedback is meant to be genuine. The evaluations can be targeted to analyze specific issues like
leadership, listening, nonverbal interactions, member participation, and
climate. I think it is similar to the feedback form that we fill in every
semester after the class is over with an intention to help the instructor
incorporate or bypass few assignments or teaching styles that were appreciated
or condemned by the class. These questions on the evaluation form are like
1. How
would you rate the group’s final decision?
a.
Excellent
b.
Good
c.
OK
d.
Adequate
e.
Poor
2.
What are the weaknesses?
3.
What changes can be made to the group's decision making process?
4.
What were the highlights of the meeting?
5.
Any suggestions to improvise this activity in
the next meeting?
The evaluation forms that the school provides for our professor is the best way to inform head honchos about the course. This will help improve classes for the next semester. As students, it is difficult to find classes we want. Some may settle for classes that fit their schedule versus classes they need for graduation. Anyways, classes can go unexpected and lead to miscommunication. However, expressing the thoughts through the evaluation will help resolve situations that may have occurred during the current semester. As the new semester approaches, professor will know what to expect from their students as the generation changes every year.
ReplyDelete